To omegadom and back

“Hello, alpha male lover,” a morning greeting from Chromo online. Good to see him online.

I am cooking dinner now, not very alpha male. He joked and I laughed.

A short conversation about alpha males ensued. Chromo said that SNAGs were created because it was thought that SNAGs are better suited for the post-feminism women.

AH….Feminism. Evil Feminism. The one that had me so confused about my role as a woman for a long while and the one that confuses our males, turning most alpha males non-alpha, into SNAGs.

Yes, I like alpha males. It is the way a man should be. You can call him MCP if you like. But MCP is a term created by the feminists, feminists who are responsible for the adverse circumstances that I have to deal with as a female.

Feminism has betrayed women, an evil plot by the devil, in my opinion. And by saying that, I am not being extreme.

Read What Our Mothers Didn’t Tell Us by Danielle Crittenden, you would know what I mean.

Females are shunning marriages and kids for a glamourous career, thinking that independence and liberation means also having an adventurous sex life.

Crittenden explains that women are lead to think that having a sexually liberated life is liberating and is being independent, but by doing that sabotage themselves.

“If men feel that they can flit from woman to woman, they will. They will enjoy our ready availablility and exploit it to their advantage. But if women as a group cease to be readily available – if they begin to demand commitment (and real commitment, as in marriage) in exchange for sex – market conditions will shift in favour of women.”

“The woman who holds back from sex, waiting for the right man to come along, will find that no right man does – because he can get what he needs elsewhere – just as the woman who gives herself freely discovers that she holds no firmer grasp over him, either. The sexual revolution, from a male point of view, could be summed up as, “You mean I get to do whatever I want – and then leave? Great!”

Feminists think they are liberated. Isn’t it a joke?

Moving from the dating front to married life, what has the feminist movement done?

Men doing more household chores, feeding babies, vaccuming the floors. Isn’t it great?

But look at the price to pay – male unreliability, weaker men who do not want to shoulder responsibilities.

“The same impulse that leads men to sleep with women and not call them again or to date a woman for months and then vanish at the first inquiry of seriousness affects those men, too, who take the step of getting married but then blanch at any escalation of responsibility – at the suggestion of buying a house, for instance, or having a child.” Crittenden wrote.

Today, men expect women to work and share economic responsibility. The feminist movement that has the women flooding the workforce, earning an independent life and equal social status with men has them now holding on to their career because men are less dependable and have become responsibility-shirkers.

So I blame the feminist movement that I have a small pool of alpha males to choose from because most males have fled to become SNAGs, writing poems, singing songs and lighting candles. Women are led to think SNAGs are good for them also help shifting more men from the alpha male pool to the SNAG pool.

It is an easier job being a man these days. Much burden has been shifted to the women.

Feminism says it is okay for men to live like a Charlie male or worse omega males, because the women have taken over half the responsibilities in return for independence, in return for not having to live in the kitchen, not getting blenders for birthdays.

I blame the feminist movement for removing the glass ceilings such that I find chasing a career very rewarding and making it very hard to me to leave my post to stay at home to look after my alpha male (if I ever find one) and my alpha boys.